In a report published on 19 July 2018, the Science and Technology Committee have called on the UK Government to ensure that a post-Brexit UK immigration system facilitates the mobility of the science and innovation community. The Committee previously submitted a recommendation for the Governments’ Migration Advisory Committee, asking the Government to conclude their immigration arrangements with the EU by October 2018.
This recommendation was rejected, and so in lieu of any plan by the Government, the Committee have developed their own proposal, as they state:
“We recommend that the Government uses our immigration proposal as the basis for further, detailed work with the science and innovation community to ‘co-create’ an immigration policy; one that facilitates the global movement of talent into the UK and helps to ensure the UK maintains its world-class status in innovation, research and development.”
The proposal is based on principles;
For short-term migration, the Committee have proposed that the Government create a system for skilled workers, which would provide entry to the UK for 180 days which is both visa-free and permit-free. The proposal states that eligibility verification will be established at the border, whereupon skilled workers must prove their intent to leave within that period, and provide a letter from their employer indicating the nature of the skilled work. The scheme appears to expand the standard visitor visa to remove a great deal of restriction placed on the definition of ‘work’, similar to the US ESTA which allows travellers to enter the US for business or tourism for 90 days or less.
For long-term migration to the UK, they outline a five-year skilled work permit for those with a minimum salary which reflects the going rate for that occupation, or an offer of employment mirroring these specifications. This new permit would be comparable the ‘talent passport’ model which is used in France, which includes categories such as scientists, where applicants need only a ‘hosting agreement’ and the equivalent of a Master’s degree to apply for a four year visa.
The Committee believe the future immigration system should take into consideration:
At present, applications are only considered if the applicant can obtain an endorsement from one of the ‘designated competent bodies’, such as the Royal Society or the Royal Academy of Engineering.
It is identified by the Committee that the Tier 1 (Exceptional Talent) visa is a rigid route for those wishing to enter the UK, which they state “has led to the assumption that only potential Nobel Prize winners need apply. As a result, take up of the visa has been disappointing.”
As part of their proposal, the Committee recommended that the Government works with the designated competent bodies to revise and clarify the criteria for eligibility so as to attract more potential applicants. The Committee state that the Government should provide the designated competent bodies with the resources to ensure that this route is well-publicised and correctly pitched, Professor Catlow of the Royal Society acknowledges that the original wording of the requirements was “interpreted as the absolute elite of the elite – the Nobel prize level – which was not in fact the original intention”
The Committee remind us that until April 2012, students who had studies at a UK higher or further education institution and had a recognised UK Bachelor or Postgraduate degree or diploma, were able to apply for a Tier 1 (post-study work) visa.
Citing “almost all” submissions for a future immigration system, the report highlights that it was essential to allow graduates to stay and work after studying in the UK. In effect, the Committee recommended that the Government re-instates the Tier 1 (post-study work) visa route for graduates with a recognised degree from a UK higher education institution.
A myriad of problems with the operation of the Tier 2 visa are identified in the report, such as:
With a view to ameliorating some of the obstacles for those skilled workers who wish to work in the UK, the Committee recommends that the Government:
Whether the Government will take heed of these proposals remains to be seen.
It should be noted that a number of policies which the Committee propose to alter were originally announced by the Prime Minister whilst she was Home Secretary, thus it seems unlikely that proposals such as re-instating the post-study work visa will ever come to fruition. On the other hand, with the removal of doctors and nurses from the Tier 2 visa cap and the rule change for breaks in continuous residency, the Government have shown a degree of flexibility on immigration policy.
If you are an academic or researcher and would like more information tailored to your circumstances, we offer consultations and a full application service to provide advice and assistance on the best course of action to take to secure your visit to the UK.
At McGill & Co, we have significant experience in entry clearance and visit visa applications. If you require assistance with a visit visa application or refusal, please do not hesitate to contact us online online.
Elena Goodall via Google - 28/12/1928 December 2019
David Meighan via google - 08/12/1908 December 2019
Thomas Hampson via Google - 14/10/1914 October 2019
RT @mckinneytweets: “You have your law, I have mine”: a Home Office civil servant making legal arguments in the immigration tribunal, accor…
about 3 hours ago
RT @john_vassiliou1: Reports of a sneaky UKVCAS fee increase for biometric appointments, can @SopraSteria_uk confirm and can @ukhomeoffice…
about 2 days ago